| Request a sample from "The Infoshop", another service of Global Information.
|
SUMMARY
This study is an addendum to the National Overview study published for U.S.
Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Markets. The study includes
state-wise information on statutory authorities, number and status of sites,
contaminants of concern, top polluting industries and regional trends.
Offering Value-added Propositions May be Vital to Finalizing Contracts
After a few years of sluggish growth, the remediation market is witnessing
healthy activity. Along with the huge amount of federal dollars being spent on
cleanups, the private sector has been actively pursuing remediation and
redevelopment. While the demand for innovative and cost-effective technologies
has 'raised the bar' for remediation contractors, participants are offering
value for money propositions as incentives to seal contracts. Schemes such as
guaranteed fixed price remediation (GFPR) give clients more freedom and take
away a considerable amount of risks involved in undertaking cleanups. While a
number of contractors are using such incentives to retain and expand client
base, a shift toward corporate clients buying insurance coverage for cleanups
is putting remediators at larger risks.
This Frost & Sullivan research service analyzes the U.S. soil and groundwater
remediation technology markets -- by analysis regions 6 to 10, besides
examining the remediation market across the said regions. It further lists the
state specific regulatory programs across these regions and analyzes market
participants and potential opportunities.
Booming Property Prices Increase Focus on Remediation and Redevelopment
With ever-increasing commercialization, there has been a sharp decline in
availability of quality real estate, which is resulting in soaring land
prices. To guarantee wider land availability, the federal government is
introducing tax benefits and incentives on remediation and redevelopment
projects. Even with faster pace of redevelopment, there will still be a huge
number of sites to clear over the next decade, and this will ensure continuous
federal expenditure on remediation and redevelopment.
In addition, the threat of new 'emerging contaminants' is driving the need for
better cleanup technologies and more stringent regulations. While bigger
companies have the resources and financial backup to undertake most kinds of
remediation projects, small and medium-sized regional companies have the
advantage of local presence. "Since, in some cases, it is difficult for bigger
companies to relocate resources to certain sites, regional contractors are
better positioned to bag these contracts." notes the analyst of this research.
"Further, the government administration is providing incentives and benefits
to small- and medium-sized firms and giving them preference in federal
contracts."
Increased Demand for Cleanups May Ensure Strong Market Growth
With the economy recovering, there is a shift in focus to issues such as
remediation, rising industrial and residential property prices, and stringent
state public health goals. While this is prompting greater stakeholder
pressure for cleanups, state agencies are heeding this demand and implementing
more meaningful programs with a view to diminishing discrepancies between the
state and federal governments.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regions 6 to 10 are considered
healthy market for remedial work. "Despite the seemingly diminished federal
funding for programs such as Superfund, the Department of Defense (DOD), and
the Department of Energy (DOE), remediation work is picking up in these
segments," says the analyst. "With remediation contractors adopting innovative
methods of treatment, large-scale Brownfield redevelopments and private sector
cleanups may contribute to sustained market growth."
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- 1. Executive Summary
- 2. State Specific Regulatory Analysis
- 1. Variations from Federal Regulations
- 1. EPA Region 6 States
- 2. EPA Region 7 States
- 3. EPA Region 8 States
- 4. EPA Region 9 States
- 5. EPA Region 10 States
- 3. Industries and Contaminants
- 1. Contaminant Analysis and Top Industries
- 1. EPA Region 6
- 2. EPA Region 7
- 3. EPA Region 8
- 4. EPA Region 9
- 5. EPA Region 10
- 4. Remediation Site Classification
- 1. Regional Site Analysis
- 1. Superfund and NPL Sites
- 2. Department of Defense (DOD)
- 3. Department of Energy (DOE)
- 4. Brownfields
- 5. Underground Storage Tanks (UST)
- 5. Market Evaluation
- 1. Market and Trends
- 1. Competitive Structure
- 2. Company Profiles
- 3. Regional Trends - Ongoing Remediation Projects
- 6. Frost and Sullivan Awards
- 1. Award Categories
- 1. Brand Development Strategy Leadership
- 2. Excellence in Technology
- 7. Decision Support Database
- 1. Pertinent Environmental Industry Data
- 1. Percentage of Groundwater Source Supply
- 2. Environment Protection Expenditure - A Percentage of GDP
- 3. Environmental Protection Expenditure
List Of Figures
Chapter 3
- Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market - EPA Region 6 to 10:
Contaminants and Top Industries - Arkansas (U.S.), 2004
- Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market - EPA Region 6 to 10:
Contaminants and Top Industries - Louisiana (U.S.), 2004
- Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market - EPA Region 6 to 10:
Contaminants and Top Industries - New Mexico (U.S.), 2004
- Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market - EPA Region 6 to 10:
Contaminants and Top Industries - Oklahoma (U.S.), 2004
- Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market - EPA Region 6 to 10:
Contaminants and Top Industries - Texas (U.S.), 2004
- Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market - EPA Region 6 to 10:
Contaminants and Top Industries - Iowa (U.S.), 2004
- Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market - EPA Region 6 to 10:
Contaminants and Top Industries - Kansas (U.S.), 2004
- Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market - EPA Region 6 to 10:
Contaminants and Top Industries - Missouri (U.S.), 2004
- Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market - EPA Region 6 to 10:
Contaminants and Top Industries - Nebraska (U.S.), 2004
- Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market - EPA Region 6 to 10:
Contaminants and Top Industries - Colorado (U.S.), 2004
- Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market - EPA Region 6 to 10:
Contaminants and Top Industries - Montana (U.S.), 2004
- Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market - EPA Region 6 to 10:
Contaminants and Top Industries - North Dakota (U.S.), 2004
- Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market - EPA Region 6 to 10:
Contaminants and Top Industries - South Dakota (U.S.), 2004
- Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market - EPA Region 6 to 10:
Contaminants and Top Industries - Utah (U.S.), 2004
- Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market - EPA Region 6 to 10:
Contaminants and Top Industries - Wyoming (U.S.), 2004
- Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market - EPA Region 6 to 10:
Contaminants and Top Industries - Arizona (U.S.), 2004
- Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market - EPA Region 6 to 10:
Contaminants and Top Industries - California (U.S.), 2004
- Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market - EPA Region 6 to 10:
Contaminants and Top Industries - Hawaii (U.S.), 2004
- Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market - EPA Region 6 to 10:
Contaminants and Top Industries - Nevada (U.S.), 2004
- Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market - EPA Region 6 to 10:
Contaminants and Top Industries - Alaska (U.S.), 2004
- Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market - EPA Region 6 to 10:
Contaminants and Top Industries - Idaho (U.S.), 2004
- Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market - EPA Region 6 to 10:
Contaminants and Top Industries - Oregon (U.S.), 2004
- Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market - EPA Region 6 to 10:
Contaminants and Top Industries - Washington (U.S.), 2004
Chapter 5
- Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market - EPA Region 6 to 10:
Competitive Structure (U.S.), 2004
- Company Profile of URS Corporation
- Company Profile of Shaw Group
- Company Profile of MSE Technology Applications, Inc.
- Company Profile of Arcadis
- Company Profile of Regenesis
|